Moving beyond two languages The effects of multilingualism on language processing and language learning

نویسندگان

  • Jared Linck
  • Ewa Golonka
چکیده

rom diplomatic negotiation to translation of foreign communications to interpreting in conflict zones, language skills are vital to national security. Because it is sometimes difficult to predict which languages will be of strategic importance in the future, U.S. Government agencies need to select and train personnel in new languages as quickly as possible. A common strategy is to identify personnel who are already working in a foreign language and train them in a new language, an approach known as cross-training, which includes conversion.1 Research on cross-training per se is very limited and consists primarily of a few documented cases of cross-training courses that were shorter than regular courses but produced similar results. The currently available evidence from the fields of psycholinguistics and Second Language Acquisition (SLA) suggests that multilingual learning can be affected by an individual’s cognitive control and overall proficiency in previously learned languages, and that previous linguistic knowledge and language learning experience can also affect the individual’s learning of consecutive languages. In particular, it has been documented that language similarity of the L3 to any known language may improve learning. However, little is known about specific ways to achieve successful cross-training via multilingual pedagogy. The goal of the current report is to open a new avenue of investigation by considering multilingual cross-training issues from a psycholinguistic perspective by reviewing the existing literature on the processing and acquisition of multiple languages. Over the last 30 years, a growing body of psycholinguistic research has been devoted to the study of bilingual language processing and second language (L2) acquisition. Although the term “L2” is often used in the scientific literature to refer to any language other than one’s native tongue (L1), relatively little research has focused on issues that are specific to learning or processing a third language (L3) or beyond. In this report we review existing research on the psycholinguistic and cognitive factors that may affect the learning and use of languages beyond the L2. Before we begin, it is important to clarify terminology:

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Collocational Processing in Two Languages: A psycholinguistic comparison of monolinguals and bilinguals

With the renewed interest in the field of second language learning for the knowledge of collocating words, research findings in favour of holistic processing of formulaic language could support the idea that these language units facilitate efficient language processing. This study investigated the difference between processing of a first language (L1) and a second language (L2) of congruent col...

متن کامل

The Impact of Learning Styles on the Iranian EFL Learners' Input Processing

This research study explored the impact of learning styles and input modalities on the second language (L2) learners' input processing (IP). This study also sought to appraise the usefulness of Processing Instruction (PI) and its components in relation to the learners' learning styles and input modalities. To this end, 73 male and female Iranian EFL learners from Islamic Azad University, North ...

متن کامل

Comparative Study of Degree of Bilingualism in Lexical Retrieval and Language Learning Strategies

This study compares lexical retrieval amongst monolinguals and intermediate bilinguals and advanced bilinguals. It also investigates the possible effects of their language learning strategies on their respective lexical retrieval advantage. The study used a mixed methods design and the groups consisted of 20 Persian near-monolinguals, 20 Persian-English intermediate level bilinguals, and 20 Per...

متن کامل

A Reflection on Kristeva's Approach to the Structure of Language

Reaching out to history and subject in terms of meaning variation, Kristeva could show that language cannot simply be a Saussurean sign system. Rather, she went on to delineate that language, beyond signs, is associated with a dynamic system of signification where the ''speaking subject'' is constantly involved in processing. Julia Kristeva, a French critic, psychoanalyst, theoretician, a post-...

متن کامل

The Effect of Dynamic Assessment of Language Learning: A Review of Literature

Researchers have historically noted the importance of Dynamic Assessment and its effect on students’ language learning. DA offers teachers and learners vast opportunities for language teaching and learning. The present article can be considered as part of the recent trend in the field of language teaching. It attempts to describe Dynamic Assessment and review the literature on the effect of DA ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014